THE CARD
The protocol in numbers.
Genesis & $SPRM
FIXED AT DEPLOYMENT| Genesis Specimens | 2,222 |
| Mint price | 0.028 ETH |
| Whitelist limit | 2 per wallet |
| Public limit | 3 per transaction |
| Chain | Robinhood Chain |
| Team allocation | none |
| Secondary royalty | 5% → SPRM Bank (ETH) |
| Total supply | 1,000,000,000 |
| Genesis Seed | 444,400,000 44.44% |
| SPRM Bank | 155,600,000 15.56% |
| Team allocation | none |
| Trading tax | 3% buy / 3% sell → rewards and Bank |
Every Specimen mints holding 200,000 $SPRM inside its own account, permanently bound.
Four rules
01 $SPRM CAN ENTER A SPECIMEN.
IT CAN NEVER LEAVE.
THE EXIT FUNCTION DOES NOT EXIST.
02 TOTAL SUPPLY IS FIXED AND ONLY CONTRACTS.
THERE IS NO EMISSION SCHEDULE.
03 ACTIVATION IS 100% BURNED AND RESETS
ON EVERY TRANSFER.
04 SUPPLY IS 2,222 AND CANNOT GROW.
THERE IS NO SEASON TWO.
HOW IT WORKS
Mechanics only. The reasoning behind each choice is in THE REASONING.
The Specimen
ERC-6551 ACCOUNTEach Genesis Specimen owns an ERC-6551 account: a persistent place to hold capital, receive distributions, acquire assets, and accumulate a permanent history. The NFT is the key to that account, not a picture attached to one.
Control of the account follows ownership of the NFT. When a Specimen changes hands the owner changes, and nothing else does.
OWNER │ ▼ GENESIS SPECIMEN │ ├── ERC-6551 ACCOUNT │ ├── Seed │ ├── External assets │ ├── Lab inventory │ └── Protocol state │ └── PERMANENT HISTORY
Supply is 2,222 and cannot grow. In the whitelist phase a wallet may take two; in the public phase up to three per transaction. Both limits are enforced at the contract.
The bound account
ONE-WAYERC-6551 gives an NFT its own account. The standard also gives the NFT's owner unrestricted execution rights over it — the owner can call anything, approve anything, withdraw everything.
SPRM Labs removes that for one asset.
Once $SPRM enters a Genesis account it becomes Seed, and there is no path back out.
LIQUID $SPRM ─────────► SEED
1:1
SEED ────X────► LIQUID $SPRM
Seed is not a second token, not wrapped $SPRM, not a staking receipt, not a points balance. It is the same $SPRM under a different permission state.
The execution policy
- Receive $SPRM
- Protocol distribution
- Voluntary seeding
- Activation
- Approved lab spend
- Burn
- Approved protocol settlement
- Withdraw to owner
- Transfer to arbitrary address
- Arbitrary ERC-20 approval
- DEX swap from Seed
- Generic execution used to escape
The restriction is enforced at the account execution layer, not the frontend, and applies to $SPRM specifically. SPCX, NFTs and other assets held by the account remain withdrawable by the owner.
Capital is bound. Earnings are not.
The Seed
44.44% BOUND AT BLOCK ONEThe protocol allocates 444,400,000 $SPRM across the 2,222 Specimens.
444,400,000 / 2,222 = 200,000 $SPRM per Specimen
Bound at block one. No vest, no cliff, no unlock, no claim.
Seed has two jobs, and neither of them is earning:
It pays for activation.
Every activation and reactivation is drawn from it.
It is the Laboratory's only currency.
Assets, items and events all price in Seed.
Seeding
Anyone can add Seed to any Specimen by sending liquid $SPRM to its account at 1:1. No cap, no whitelist, no cooldown. The moment it lands, the transition is permanent.
Activation
100% BURNA Specimen mints dormant and earns nothing. Activation is paid exclusively from its own Seed balance in $SPRM. No ETH, no separate token, no payment from an external wallet.
Tiers
| Tier | Activation cost | Reward multiplier |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | 88,888 $SPRM | 1x |
| T2 | 222,222 $SPRM | 1.6x |
| T3 | 388,888 $SPRM | 2x |
Each step up costs more than the step before it and buys less multiplier than the step before it.
COST BUYS T1 88,888 1.0x T2 +133,334 +0.6x T3 +166,666 +0.4x
A Specimen begins with 200,000 Seed. T1 is reachable from that allocation. T2 and T3 are not — both require acquiring liquid $SPRM on the open market and binding it before the burn.
The burn
SPECIMEN SEED
│
▼
ACTIVATION
│
▼
100% BURN
100% of $SPRM used for activation is burned. No portion goes to the team, the Bank, the reward pool, or any treasury.
Insufficient Seed
A Specimen cannot activate into a tier it cannot afford. The holder deposits additional liquid $SPRM, which becomes permanently bound as Seed, and activation then consumes it.
LIQUID $SPRM → SEED → ACTIVATION COST → BURN
There is no bypass around the Seed layer.
This applies to reactivation. A T1 activation leaves 111,112 Seed — enough for one more T1 after a transfer and nothing past that, so a Specimen that changes hands repeatedly needs a deposit unless hourly distribution has refilled the gap.
Transfer reset
Activation does not transfer with the NFT. Every transfer or sale resets it — the Specimen returns to dormant and the new owner must activate again and select a new tier.
Remaining Seed, assets and history stay with the NFT. Activation count is public and permanent.
Rewards
HOURLY · NO CLAIMRewards are funded by trading fees, never by minting new supply.
3% BUY / 3% SELL
│
├── 2.4% → REWARD ENGINE
│ ├── 70% SPCX
│ └── 30% $SPRM MARKET BUY
│
└── 0.6% → SPRM BANK
| Destination | Share of trade value |
|---|---|
| SPCX acquisition | 1.68% |
| $SPRM market purchase | 0.72% |
| SPRM Bank | 0.60% |
The 56 / 24 / 20 split applies to what reaches the distributor, not to trade value directly. The distributor converts through the same pool and pays the same fee there, so the settled ratio lands near 55.4 / 24.6 / 19.8.
Share
REWARD SHARE_i = TIER MULTIPLIER_i / Σ TIER MULTIPLIER_active
Seed balance does not enter the formula. A Specimen holding 5,000,000 Seed at T1 earns exactly what a Specimen holding 5,000 Seed at T1 earns.
Dormant Specimens are absent from both numerator and denominator, so they forfeit their share to the active population rather than diluting it.
Distribution
Rewards are calculated and airdropped directly into Specimen accounts every hour. No claim transaction, no gas paid to receive, no unclaimed balance sitting in a contract.
The two streams
SPCX is the external reward. Acquired with protocol revenue, distributed to active Specimens, liquid and withdrawable.
$SPRM is bought on the open market — never minted — and sent into Specimen accounts, where it becomes bound Seed.
SPCX → income liquid, external, withdrawable SEED → spending power bound, internal, spends in the Lab
The hourly $SPRM distribution is not compounding a yield. It is building a budget.
The SPRM Bank
HELD IN ETHThe Bank is multi-currency — royalties arrive in ETH, the trading-fee share in $SPRM — and it is the protocol's only source of external capital.
0.60% OF $SPRM TRADING VOLUME + 5% GENESIS SECONDARY ROYALTY
It additionally holds the 15.56% $SPRM allocation reserved for operations and liquidity.
Royalties route entirely to the Bank where marketplace infrastructure enforces them. Expected royalties are never treated as realized capital — only ETH actually received is accounted for or deployed.
Bank capital deploys into NFTs, Laboratory inventory, ecosystem assets, prizes, events, incentives, and future products.
Because royalties are independent of token volume, the two revenue lines fail independently. If $SPRM trades flat, the Bank keeps accruing and the Lab keeps acquiring inventory.
The Laboratory
WHERE SEED SPENDSA holder connects one or several wallets. The Lab resolves every Specimen across them into a single interface. Aggregation is application-layer only — custody does not change and each Specimen keeps its own account.
The Lab is never the source of truth. The chain is. Every figure must be reproducible from contract storage and protocol events.
History
Every meaningful action is permanent record: mint, transfers, activation and tier selection, Seed deposits, hourly distributions, burns, SPCX received, asset acquisitions and Lab purchases.
A seller cannot rewrite a Specimen's history through metadata. Due diligence on a Specimen is a computation.
Market
The Lab makes external and protocol-owned assets available in exchange for Seed.
SPRM BANK │ ▼ BUYS NFT WITH ETH │ ▼ LAB LISTING — 40,000 SEED │ ├──────────────► NFT → SPECIMEN ACCOUNT │ └──────────────► 40,000 SEED → BURN
If the Specimen lacks enough Seed, the holder acquires liquid $SPRM and Seeds it first.
WANT LAB ASSET → NEED SEED → BUY $SPRM → SEED IT → SPEND → BURN
Every clearing event publishes a public, market-set price for bound $SPRM. A $6,000 asset clearing at 1,200,000 Seed values bound $SPRM at $0.005 in real assets — established by transaction, not assertion.
Terminal paths
Seed spent inside the Laboratory is destroyed.
SEED → BURN
There is no path from Seed back to liquid $SPRM.
Future modules
Asset markets, Lab items, auctions, Bank-funded events, collection mechanics, and randomized prize systems where legally permissible. Not separate token economies — modules on the same Specimen, Seed and account state.
THE REASONING
Why each mechanic above is shaped the way it is, and what was rejected to get there.
Why yield NFTs die
FOUR LEAKSEvery one of them died the same way. Value had a door out of the system and no door back in.
The sequence is identical each time. A collection emits a token to its holders. Holders sell it, because selling is the only way to realize the yield. The price falls. Emissions continue at the same rate against a lower price, so the yield story now requires more emissions to say the same number. The team ships a second season to fund operations and dilutes everyone who arrived first. The token goes to zero and the collection follows it down.
Four leaks produce that sequence.
No mandatory sink.
Cosmetic renames and optional raffles are skippable by definition. A token nobody is required to buy has only speculative demand.
Yield paid in the asset it inflates.
If the only reward is the protocol's own token, realizing a return means selling the thing you hold. Every participant is structurally a seller.
A growable claimant count.
Season two is dilution as a business model. No yield formula on an expandable supply has a stable denominator.
Churn that returns nothing.
A flip on a zero-royalty venue pays holders nothing and burns nothing.
What each leak is answered with
No mandatory sink → earning is gated behind a burn.
A Specimen that has not activated receives nothing, and activation is payable in $SPRM only. Nobody participates without first removing tokens from supply. The sink is not a feature a holder can decline; it is the condition of entry, and it recurs — the gate closes again on every transfer.
Yield inflates the asset → 70% of rewards are external, and the other 30% cannot be sold.
SPCX is acquired with protocol revenue and arrives liquid and withdrawable, so realizing income does not require selling $SPRM. The $SPRM portion is bought on the open market rather than minted, and it lands inside a Specimen account where no withdrawal function exists. It is a permanent bid with no matching offer. A conventional design creates sell pressure with every distribution; this one removes float with every distribution.
Growable claimants → the denominator is 2,222 and there is no second issuance.
Supply is fixed at deployment with no mint function on the NFT contract. Beyond that, 44.44% of $SPRM was bound inside Specimen accounts at block one, with no vest, cliff, or unlock — it was never in circulation and has no mechanism to enter it. There is no team allocation to release. Dilution requires a lever, and the levers were not built.
Churn returns nothing → every transfer forces a fresh burn.
Activation does not survive a sale. The buyer must reactivate, which means burning $SPRM, and a Specimen that has already activated once rarely holds enough Seed to do it again without a deposit. Secondary volume therefore converts into token demand and permanent supply reduction. A Specimen flipped five times has burned five activations, and the count is public on its record.
The property underneath all four
Each answer resolves to the same structural fact: $SPRM has an entrance to the Specimen account and no exit. Tokens can be seeded in, distributed in, and burned out of existence. Nothing moves the other direction, because the function does not exist and the contract cannot be upgraded to add one.
That makes every distribution a permanent removal from float rather than a deferred sale, and every activation a permanent destruction rather than a transfer to a treasury.
Name a flow in this protocol that pays someone who is not a holder. There is exactly one — the operational share of the Bank — documented in Section 06.
Why the binding is one-way
THREE CONSEQUENCESA conventional 6551 account's contents are worth nothing to a buyer until the moment transfer settles, because the seller can empty it one block earlier. Every collection using the standard inherits this. It is why 6551 balances have never functioned as a floor.
Removing the exit path produces three things a withdrawable balance cannot.
The Seed becomes a real floor.
A buyer looking at a Specimen holding 400,000 Seed will receive 400,000 Seed. Verifying it does not require trusting the seller. A Specimen listed below the market value of its own Seed is an arbitrage, and arbitrage gets taken.
Distribution stops being circular.
$SPRM the protocol buys and sends into a Specimen is retired, not parked. No holder decision, no vesting schedule, no market condition returns it to the order book.
The Laboratory gets a captive currency.
Bound $SPRM has exactly one counterparty, so the Lab's price list is not a price list — it is an exchange rate.
The standard treats the token-bound account as a container the owner can empty. This implementation treats it as a vault. The difference is that one of them can be priced by a buyer.
Why there is no emission schedule
SUPPLY ONLY CONTRACTSA fixed daily print is the most common design in this category and the reason most of them fail. It requires perpetual new demand simply to hold price flat, and hands early participants an advantage that later participants finance.
$SPRM's supply is fixed at deployment. Three mechanisms remove tokens from circulation and none add to it:
BUYBACK 0.72% of every trade, bound into Seeds SEEDING voluntary, unbounded, one-way BURNS activation, reactivation, Lab consumption
Rewards are funded by fees actually collected. If volume is zero, distribution is zero. The protocol has no mint function and cannot substitute issuance for revenue.
Tier convergence
FIXED POOLRewards are a share of a fixed pool, so a tier is only an advantage relative to what everyone else selected.
If every Specimen sits at T1, each receives 1/2,222 of every distribution. If every Specimen sits at T3, each still receives 1/2,222 — having burned 388,888 $SPRM to get there.
The advantage of a higher tier erodes as the collection upgrades. An early T3 is a real edge over a field of T1s, and that edge narrows as others follow.
What does change is supply. A collection fully upgraded to T3 has burned 864,109,136 $SPRM, most of it acquired from the open market since T2 and T3 both cost more than a Specimen's Genesis allocation. The tier race is a coordination problem for holders and a supply sink for the protocol, and both are true at once.
Accounting
THREE CATEGORIESThree categories that never collapse into one number. Merging them would present bound tokens and external assets as the same thing.
| Category | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Income | SPCX received — external and liquid |
| Distribution | $SPRM received as Seed — permanently bound |
| Basis | Mint cost and capital contributed |
Seed is never displayed as earnings. It is spending power inside the Laboratory. A Specimen's Seed balance and its reward share are unrelated figures and are never presented as though one drives the other.
Collection state, published live
The intent is a protocol that can be inspected as an economy rather than summarized as statistics.
Security model
EIGHT FAILURE MODESKnown failure modes and the mechanism that addresses each.
Seed escape.
An owner uses arbitrary execution, approvals or a router to extract protected $SPRM. Restrictions are enforced at account execution level; any path capable of moving Seed outside approved contracts must revert. Frontend restrictions are not security.
Reward inflation.
Rewards introduce new liquid $SPRM into circulation. Reward-side $SPRM is purchased from the open market and converted directly into Seed. No emission schedule exists.
Tier inflation.
Higher tiers advertise larger rewards by manufacturing larger pools. Tiers modify allocation only. All tiers compete for the same distribution generated by activity that occurred.
Tier convergence.
The relative advantage of a higher tier erodes toward zero as the collection upgrades. A property of dividing a fixed pool. Section 11. Tier participation, upgrade pacing, burn rate against float and reactivation frequency are modelled before deployment.
Dormant recovery.
A Specimen can spend enough Seed that reactivation becomes unaffordable. The owner can always recapitalize by adding liquid $SPRM. Any automatic recovery mechanism is a separate decision and must be deterministic before deployment.
Liquid assets inside the account.
Seed is bound; SPCX and other assets may be withdrawable. A marketplace cannot assume every visible asset survives to settlement. The Lab distinguishes BOUND from OWNER-WITHDRAWABLE. A future native marketplace can introduce sealed settlement.
Royalty dependence.
Royalties are not revenue until received. If a marketplace does not enforce them, those funds do not exist. The Bank reports realized balances only.
Distribution failure.
Hourly distribution is automated. Snapshot logic, share calculation and settlement must be deterministic and independently reproducible, so a missed cycle can be verified against chain state and reconciled.
Hard questions
SIXDoes bound $SPRM function as a currency or as points?
The distinction is whether a counterparty exists. It has one: the Laboratory, funded in ETH by fees and royalties. Every clearing event sets a real price against a real asset. Points do not have a market-established rate.
Is the $SPRM side of rewards circular?
Partly, which is why it is labeled a distribution rather than income. It is a real market bid, permanently retired — supply mechanics, not revenue. The income argument rests on SPCX and the Bank, both external.
If Seed does not affect rewards, what is it for?
It is the only currency the Laboratory accepts, and every activation is paid from it. A large Seed balance is buying power, not yield.
If every Specimen reaches T3, does the tier still matter?
Relative to each other, no. Section 11 covers this in full.
What can the team change after deployment?
Not the supply cap or the one-way binding — neither has an admin path, and the exit function was never written. Parameters marked TBD are the changeable surface, and they lock before launch. There is no team allocation, and none will be added without prior disclosure.
What happens in a flat market?
Distribution falls toward zero. Rewards are funded by fees, fees require volume, and the protocol has no mint function to fill the gap. The Bank continues accruing from royalties, so the Laboratory keeps operating. The design degrades under low activity rather than compensating for it.
Invariants
19 RULESParameters may change. The invariants should not.
Open before deployment
TBDRemaining implementation work:
- ERC-6551 Seed execution policy
- fee-router
- hourly distribution engine and snapshot logic
- event and indexer specification
- marketplace settlement rules
- randomized prize mechanics where legally permissible
- economic simulation
- deployment testing and audit
Final principle
RULES, NOT PROMISESSPRM does not rely on promising an outcome. It defines a set of irreversible state transitions.
Capital can enter a Specimen. It can become productive. It can be consumed. It can move between Specimens under explicit rules. It can be destroyed.
What it cannot do is quietly leave the system through a path the protocol claims does not exist.
rules, not promises.